4.4 Article

Protective effect of single-dose adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine in children

期刊

INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 171-178

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00146.x

关键词

adjuvanted; effectiveness; influenza; Paediatric; pandemic; vaccination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background During the first wave of A/California/7/2009(H1N1) influenza, high rates of hospitalization in children under 5 years were seen in many countries. Subsequent policies for vaccinating children varied in both type of vaccine and number of doses. In Canada, children 36 months to < 10 years received a single dose of 0 center dot 25 ml of the GSK adjuvanted vaccine (Arepanrix (TM)) equivalent to 1 center dot 9 mu g HA. Children 6 months to 35 months received two doses as did those 36-119 months with chronic medical conditions. Method We conducted a community-based case-control vaccine effectiveness (VE) review of children under 10 years with influenza like illness who were tested for H1N1 infection at the central provincial laboratory. Laboratory-confirmed influenza was the primary outcome, and vaccination status the primary exposure to assess VE after a single 0 center dot 25-ml dose. Results If vaccination was designated to be effective after 14 days, no vaccinated child had laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to 38% of controls. The VE of 100% was statistically significant for children < 10 years of age and < 5 years considered separately. If vaccination was considered effective after 10 days, VE dropped to 96% overall but was statistically significant and over 90% in all age subgroups, including those under 36 months. Conclusions A single 0 center dot 25-ml dose of the GSK adjuvanted vaccine (Arepanrix (TM)) protects children against laboratory-confirmed pandemic influenza potentially avoiding any increased reactogenicity associated with second doses. Adjuvanted vaccines offer hope for improved seasonal vaccines in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据