4.5 Article

Differences of small intestinal bacteria populations in adults and children with/without celiac disease: Effect of age, gluten diet, and disease

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 649-656

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21830

关键词

celiac disease; duodenal microbiota; molecular ecology; clone library

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [PI070611]
  2. Junta de Castilla y Leon, Consejeria de Sanidad [318/A/08]
  3. Junta de Castilla y Leon
  4. Fondo Social Europeo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Scientific evidence has revealed microecological changes in the intestinal tract of celiac infants. The objective of this work is the study of bacterial differences in the upper small intestine in both adults (healthy, untreated celiac disease [CD], and CD treated with a gluten-free diet) and children (healthy and untreated CD). Methods: Intestinal bacterial communities were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of DNA extracted from duodenal biopsies. Results: Analysis of the sequences from adults and children showed that this niche was colonized by bacteria affiliated mainly with three phyla: Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. In total, 89 different genera were identified in adults and 46 in children. Bacterial richness was significantly lower in the children than in the adults. A global principal component analysis of the bacterial communities of both healthy and untreated CD patient groups (including both children and adults) revealed a strong effect of age in principal component 1-clustering all adults and children separately-and a possible effect of the disease in adults with untreated patients clustering separately. Conclusions: There are bacterial differences in the upper small intestine between untreated children CD patients and untreated CD adults due to age. There are bacterial differences in the upper small bacteria microbiota between treated and untreated CD adults due to treatment with a gluten-free diet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据