4.5 Article

New Therapeutic Targets in Ulcerative Colitis: The Importance of Ion Transporters in the Human Colon

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 884-898

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21432

关键词

ulcerative colitis; therapeutic targets; ion transporters

资金

  1. OTKA [CK 80136, NNF 78851, K79189]
  2. NKTH [TAMOP-4.2.2-08/1/2008-0002, 0013]
  3. MTA [BO/00334/08/5, BO/00174/10/5]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [Se 460/13-4, SFB621-C9]
  5. DAAD
  6. Abbot GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The absorption of water and ions (especially Na+ and Cl-) is an important function of colonic epithelial cells in both physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Despite the comprehensive animal studies, there are only scarce available data on the ion transporter activities of the normal and inflamed human colon. Methods: In this study, 128 healthy controls and 69 patients suffering from ulcerative colitis (UC) were involved. We investigated the expressional and functional characteristics of the Na+/H+ exchangers (NHE) 1-3, the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), and the SLC26A3 Cl-/HCO3- exchanger downregulated in adenoma (DRA) in primary colonic crypts isolated from human biopsy and surgical samples using microfluorometry, patch clamp, and real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques. Results: Data collected from colonic crypts showed that the activities of electroneutral (via NHE3) and the electrogenic Na+ absorption (via ENaC) are in inverse ratio to each other in the proximal and distal colon. We found no significant differences in the activity of NHE2 in different segments of the colon. Surface cell Cl-/HCO3- exchange is more active in the distal part of the colon. Importantly, both sodium and chloride absorptions are damaged in UC, whereas NHE1, which has been shown to promote immune response, is upregulated by 6-fold. Conclusions: These results open up new therapeutic targets in UC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据