4.5 Article

Adherence to Adalimumab Therapy in Crohn's Disease: A French Multicenter Experience

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 152-159

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21491

关键词

adalimumab; adherence; Crohn's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We evaluated adherence to adalimumab therapy in Crohn's disease (CD). Methods: This was an observational multicenter study conducted in four French university hospitals between April 4, 2008 and January 1, 2010. Patients were systematically asked, at each clinical visit, whether or not they delayed or missed an injection of adalimumab over the past 3 months. Patients were also asked about the reasons for their nonadherence. Results: Of the 108 patients analyzed, 33 (30.6%) delayed the administration of at least one injection and 16 (14.8%) missed at least one injection over the past 3 months. The main reasons for overall nonadherence were: forgetfulness (24.6%), infection (24.6%), and travel (20%). Other reasons for nonadherence were intentional nonadherence (10.8%), pharmaceutical supply issues (9.2%), side effects (7.7%), pregnancy (1.5%), and CD-related hospitalization (1.5%). Adalimumab regimen of 40 mg every other week was a positive predictor for injection delays (P = 0.02, odds ratio [OR] = 3.76, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-11.05), whereas having at least one relapse in the past 12 months was associated with fewer delays (P = 0.02, OR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.15-0.87) [correction made here after initial online publication]. Disease duration over 90 months negatively predicted failure to inject adalimumab (P = 0.009, OR = 0.17, 95% CI, 0.05-0.64). Conclusions: The overall nonadherence rate for adalimumab use was 45.4%. Most of the reasons for nonadherent behaviors could be avoided. An adalimumab regimen of 40 mg every other week was negatively related to adalimumab adherence; both the occurrence of at least one relapse in the past 12 months and disease duration over 90 months were positively related to adherence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据