4.5 Article

Efficacy of Infliximab in Refractory Pouchitis and Crohn's Disease-Related Complications of the Pouch: A Belgian Case Series

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 243-249

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21037

关键词

Crohn's disease; refractory pouchitis; infliximab; IPAA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Up to 25% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients undergoing surgery with art ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) will develop chronic pouchitis not responding to antibiotics. In case reports, thiopurine analogs and infliximab (IFX) have been proposed is effective therapy in this setting. We analyzed the long-term efficacy of IFX in Belgian patients with refractory pouch complications. Methods: We identified 28 IPAA patients who received IFX for refractory luminal inflammation (pouchitis and/or pre-pouch ileitis, n = 25) and/or pouch fistula (n = 7). Patients with elements of Crohn's disease after review of the colectomy specimen were excluded. Clinical response was defined as complete in case of cessation of diarrhea, blood loss, and abdominal pain, and as partial in case of marked clinical improvement. Fistula response wits defined as complete in case of cessation and as partial in case of reduction Of fistula drainage. Results: Eighty-two percent of patients were concomitantly treated with immunomodulatory agents. At week 10 following start of IFX, 88% of patients with refractory luminal inflammation showed clinical response (14 partial, 8 complete), while 6 patients (86%) showed fistula response (3 partial, 3 complete). The mPDAI dropped significantly from 9.0 (interquaritle range [IQR] 8.0-10.0) to 4.5 (3.0-7.0) points (P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 20 (7-36) months, 56% showed Sustained clinical response while 3 out of 7 fistula patients showed Sustained fistula response. Five patients needed permanent ileostomy. Conclusions: In this series, IFX was effective long-term in IPAA patients with refractory luminal inflammation and pouch fistula. These results warrant a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据