4.5 Article

Budesonide Treatment of Patients with Collagenous Colitis Restores Normal Eosinophil and T-Cell Activity in the Colon

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 1118-1126

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21188

关键词

eosinophil; T-lymphocyte; collagenous colitis; budesonide; flow cytometry

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council Medicine
  2. Hedlunds Foundation
  3. Medical Faculty, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the activity of eosinophils, neutrophils, and CD4+ as well as CD8+ T-cells in 11 patients with active collagenous colitis (CC) before and after 8 weeks of budesonide treatment (9 mg once daily) compared to 10 healthy individuals. Methods: Clinical symptoms were recorded and intestinal biopsy samples were taken and analyzed by flow cytometry. Eosinophils with a high surface expression of CD44 and low CD9 expression were classified as activated. Neutrophil activity was assessed by their expression of CD66b, and CD69 was used as an activation marker for T-cells. Results: All patients responded to the treatment. The eosinophils in active CC showed increased activity compared to controls. The activity was back to control levels after treatment. Neutrophils were not activated in CC patients before or after treatment. CD8+ T-cells from untreated CC patients had a lower activity than controls, and a tendency of lower activity was observed on CD4+ T-cells. After treatment, the activity was increased on both types of T-cells and was not different from controls. Conclusions: In the present study we demonstrated that the inflammation in CC is characterized by activated eosinophils but there is no neutrophil activity. CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells are increased in numbers in active CC but, surprisingly, they had a lower grade of activity than in control subjects. The major finding of this study is that budesonide treatment restores the normal activation of eosinophils and T-cells, accompanied by clinical remission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据