4.5 Article

Efficacy of Infliximab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Multicenter Open-label Trial Comparing Scheduled to On Demand Maintenance Therapy

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 388-394

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20788

关键词

pediatric Crohn's disease; infliximab; efficacy; safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Infliximab (IFX) is efficacious in inducing remission in severe forms of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). Adult studies indicate that IFX is also safe and well tolerated as maintenance therapy. The present Study aimed to evaluate in a prospective manner the efficacy and safety of IFX as maintenance therapy of severe pediatric CD comparing scheduled and on demand treatment strategies. Methods: Forty children with CD (nonpenetrating, nonstricturing as well as penetrating forms, mean age: 13.9 +/- 2.2 years) with a severe flare-up (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] >= 5, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] >20 mm/h) despite well-conducted immunomodulator therapy (n = 36 azathioprine, n = 1 mercaptopurine, n = 3 methotrexate) combined with steroids were included in this randomized, Multicenter, open-label study. Three IFX infusions (5 mg/kg) were administered at week (W)0/W2/W6. At W10, clinical remission (HBI <5) and steroid withdrawal were analyzed and IFX responders were randomized to maintenance therapy over I year: group A, scheduled every 2 months: group B, on demand on relapse. Results: In all. 34/40 children came into remission during IFX induction therapy (HBI: 6.7 +/- 2.5 (WO) vs. 1.1 +/- 1.5 (W10); P < 0.001). At the end of phase 2, 15/18 (83%) patients were in remission in group A compared to 8/13 (61%) children in group B (P < 0.01), with a mean HBI of 0.5 versus 3.2 points (group A versus B, P = 0.011). In group A 3/13 (23.1%) children experienced a relapse compared to 11/12 (92%) children in group B. No severe adverse event occurred during this trial. Conclusions: IFX is well tolerated and safe as maintenance therapy for pediatric CD, with a clear advantage when used on a scheduled 2-month basis compared to an on demand basis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据