4.5 Article

Clinical role of calprotectin assay in determining histological relapses in children affected by inflammatory bowel diseases

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 1229-1235

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20472

关键词

inflammatory bowel disease; children; calprotectin; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are characterized by periods of remission with recurrent episodes of symptom exacerbation because of acute intestinal inflammation. which is correctly evaluated by endoscopy with biopsy sampling. However, many surrogate markers of intestinal inflammation, including fecal calprotectin (FC), are detected as potential predictors of mucosal inflammation in IDB patients. The aim Of our study was to retrospectively assess the clinical efficacy of the calprotectin assay in determining histological relapses of pediatric IBD patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the histological examinations, clinical records, and FC Values of patients who had undergone colonoscopy at our hospital over an 8-year period, from December 31, 1998, to December 31. 2006. Only patients with a first histological examination showing a quiescent IBD who submitted to a second histological examination during the next 3 years were selected. Results: Seventy-three IBD patients, all with a first biopsy showing a quiescent IBD, were studied; at the second histological examination, 32 presented with relapse and 41 presented with remission. Relapsed patients showed significantly increased FC levels compared with nonrelapsed patients. A FC Value of 275 mu g/g achieved sensitivity and negative predictive value of 97% and specificity and positive predictive value of 85% in predicting histological relapse. Conclusions: FC seems to be a direct measure of intestinal inflammation and therefore a good marker of the risk of histological relapse in pediatric IBD patients. The application of this test in

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据