4.5 Article

Subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline treatment increases serum cholesterol efflux capacity from macrophages

期刊

INFLAMMATION RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 7, 页码 711-720

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00011-013-0626-z

关键词

Atherosclerosis; Clinical trials; Inflammation; Lipids; Macrophages

资金

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [R01DE012872, R03DE019805]
  2. Finnish Dental Society Apollonia
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Paulo Foundation
  5. Academy of Finland
  6. Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline (SDD) treatment has been reported to reduce the severity of chronic inflammation and to increase serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we determined whether SDD affects the ability of serum to facilitate cholesterol removal from macrophages. Forty-five postmenopausal osteopenic women with periodontitis were randomly assigned to take placebo (n = 26) or doxycycline hyclate (20 mg, n = 19) tablets twice daily for 2 years. Serum samples were collected at baseline, 1-, and 2-year appointments. The cholesterol efflux capacity of serum from cultured human macrophages (THP-1) was measured. SDD subjects demonstrated a significant increase in serum-mediated cholesterol efflux from macrophages at both time points compared to baseline (p < 0.04 for each). Mean cholesterol efflux levels over the first year of follow-up were 3.0 percentage points (unit change) higher among SDD subjects compared to placebo subjects (p = 0.010), while there was no significant difference in 2-year changes. There were no significant differences in the changes of apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein A-II, or serum amyloid A levels between the groups. Our results suggest that SDD treatment may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in this patient group by increasing the cholesterol efflux capacity of serum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据