4.5 Article

Vascular Protective Role of Vitexicarpin Isolated from Vitex rotundifolia in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

期刊

INFLAMMATION
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 584-593

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10753-011-9349-x

关键词

vitexicarpin; adhesion molecule; HUVEC; inflammation; NF-kappa B

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea government (MEST) [2010-0029465, K10040]
  3. Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine
  4. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [K10040] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pro-inflammatory cytokines induce injury of endothelial cells caused by increases of adhesion molecules, leading to vascular inflammation and the development of atherosclerosis. Recent pharmacological studies have demonstrated that vitexicarpin, a flavonoid isolated from Vitex rotundifolia, has anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and analgesic properties. In this study, we investigated whether vitexicarpin (5-100 nM) prevented the TNF-alpha-induced vascular inflammation process in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). We found that pretreatment with vitexicarpin decreased TNF-alpha (10 ng/ml)-induced expression of cell adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intracellular adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin as well as matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 expression. Preincubation with vitexicarpin also dose-dependently inhibited TNF-alpha-induced adhesion of HL-60 monocytic cells. Vitexicarpin significantly decreased TNF-alpha-induced intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Furthermore, vitexicarpin suppressed NF-kappa B nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity in TNF-alpha-treated HUVEC. In conclusion, vitexicarpin significantly reduced vascular inflammation, through inhibition of ROS-NF-kappa B pathway in vascular endothelial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据