4.4 Article

Tigecycline resistance caused by rpsJ evolution in a 59-year-old male patient infected with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae during tigecycline treatment

期刊

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 188-191

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.09.025

关键词

Tigecycline resistance; KPC-2 producing Klebsiella pneumonia; rpsJ; Abdominal infection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81702042, 81471986]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology plan [2018KY344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) nosocomial infection increased rapidly in recent years. By far, the anti-infection drugs for CRKP infection are limited. Tigecycline is one of the last resort treatments for CRKP infections. In this study, curative effect of tigecycline therapy was monitored in a 59-year-old male patient infected with KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. Consecutive clonal consistent K. pneumoniae isolates were cultured during tigecycline treatment. Whole genome sequencing of the isolates was performed, and bioinformatics analysis was further performed. Five isolates, four of which were susceptible and one resistant were collected. All of the isolates belong to Sequence Type 11 (ST11), and harbouring 11 gene sequences relevant to antibiotic resistance including b/a(KPC-2). One amino acid substitution V57L in rpsJ was identified in the tigecycline resistant isolates. Subsequent transformation experiment confirmed the contribution of the rpsJ variant (V57L) to reduced tigecycline susceptibility. To our knowledge, this study is the first report to provide direct in vivo evidence that evolution in the rpsJ gene can lead to tigecycline resistance in patients infected with KPC-producing K. pneumoniae during tigecycline treatment. This finding serves as a therapeutic warning as the rpsJ gene is on the chromosome of CRKP strains. Under selective pressure from tigecycline, the rpsJ mutation may occur and lead to tigecycline resistant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据