4.4 Article

Prevalence and genetic diversity of piroplasm species in horses and ticks from Tunisia

期刊

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 33-37

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.038

关键词

Theileria spp.; Babesia spp.; Horses; Ticks; RLB; Tunisia

资金

  1. Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID) [A/026818/09]
  2. Spanish National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA) [RTA2009-000-18-00-00]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. Ministry for Higher Education, Scientific Research and Technology in Tunisia
  5. INIA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic diversity and prevalence of Babesia and Theileria species in the equine population of Tunisia were studied using reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization on blood samples and unfed adult ticks collected from apparently healthy horses from three bioclimatic zones in Tunisia. Piroplasms were identified in 13 of 104 of the horse blood samples analyzed (12.5%) and five genotype groups were identified: Theileria equi group A (nine animals, 8.7%), group C (one animal, 1.0%) and group D (three animals, 2.9%), and Babesia caballi groups A and B (one animal each). All horses from the semi-arid zone were negative and prevalence in the humid and sub-humid zones were 12.9% and 20.0%, respectively. Three Ixodid tick species (Hyalomma marginatum, Hyalomma excavatum and Rhipicephalus bursa) were collected from examined horses and equine piroplasms were detected in 10.8% of them. T. equi groups A and D (9.2%), and B. caballi group B (1.6%) were identified in ticks. This work represents the first epidemiological report of equine piroplasmosis in Tunisia. Results showed a high level of diversity within the 18S rRNA gene of equine piroplasm species, and confirmed the presence in Tunisia of two T. equi genetic groups, C and D, only reported before in South Africa and Sudan. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据