4.4 Article

Characterization of predominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from different subpopulations of India

期刊

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 832-839

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.05.008

关键词

Tuberculosis; Spoligotyping; Restriction fragment length polymorphism; Shared type; Clade

资金

  1. India Clinical Epidemiology Network (INDIA-CLEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The predominant strains from India belong to Central-Asian (CAS) and the East-African-Indian (EAI) clade of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The two clades have also been shown to be geographically partitioned. The study of such strains may help to understand the characteristics that make M. tuberculosis an effective pathogen and its overrepresentation in certain populations. M. tuberculosis isolates characterized by spoligotyping under a population based tuberculosis study covering different regions from the North and South India were further analyzed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and by deletion analysis of M. tuberculosis specific deletion region 1 (TbD1). The genetic relationship of the two clades inferred using different genetic markers showed good correlation. In the North where the CAS clade predominates the isolates are characterized by presence of high IS6110 copy number and absence of TbD1 region whereas in the South where the EAI clade predominates the isolates are characterized by low copy number of IS6110 and presence of TbD1 region. The ancestral EAI strains were found to be less often associated with drug resistance or young age as compared to the CAS clade. The study highlights that the EAI lineage is well established in India and that CAS may be emerging or more recently introduced to India. The results depict a distinction in the lineage of strains from the North versus South India indicating a need to study if the pathogen has adapted to specific human populations. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据