4.4 Article

A Cluster of Mycobacterium wolinskyi Surgical Site Infections at an Academic Medical Center

期刊

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 1169-1175

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/677164

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. To study a cluster of Mycobacterium wolinskyi surgical site infections (SSIs). DESIGN. Observational and case-control study. SETTING. Academic hospital. PATIENTS. Subjects who developed SSIs with M. wolinskyi following cardiothoracic surgery. METHODS. Electronic surveillance was performed for case finding as well as electronic medical record review of infected cases. Surgical procedures were observed. Medical chart review was conducted to identify risk factors. A case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for infection; Fisher exact or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons of proportions and medians, respectively. Patient isolates were studied using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Environmental microbiologic sampling was performed in operating rooms, including high-volume water sampling. RESULTS. Six definite cases of M. wolinskyi SSI following cardiothoracic surgery were identified during the outbreak period (October 1, 2008-September 30, 2011). Having cardiac surgery in operating room A was significantly associated with infection (odds ratio, 40; P=.0027). Observational investigation revealed a cold-air blaster exclusive to operating room A as well a microbially contaminated, self-contained water source used in heart-lung machines. The isolates were indistinguishable or closely related by PFGE. No environmental samples were positive for M. wolinskyi. CONCLUSIONS. No single point source was established, but 2 potential sources, including a cold-air blaster and a microbially contaminated, self-contained water system used in heart-lung machines for cardiothoracic operations, were identified. Both of these potential sources were removed, and subsequent active surveillance did not reveal any further cases of M. wolinskyi SSI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据