4.4 Article

Terminal Decontamination of Patient Rooms Using an Automated Mobile UV Light Unit

期刊

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 737-742

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/661222

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lumalier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. To determine the ability of a mobile UV light unit to reduce bacterial contamination of environmental surfaces in patient rooms. METHODS. An automated mobile UV light unit that emits UV-C light was placed in 25 patient rooms after patient discharge and operated using a 1- or 2-stage procedure. Aerobic colony counts were calculated for each of 5 standardized high-touch surfaces in the rooms before and after UV light decontamination (UVLD). Clostridium difficile spore log reductions achieved were determined using a modification of the ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) International E2197 quantitative disk carrier test method. In-room ozone concentrations during UVLD were measured. RESULTS. For the 1-stage procedure, mean aerobic colony counts for the 5 high-touch surfaces ranged from 10.6 to 98.2 colony-forming units (CFUs) per Dey/Engley (D/E) plate before UVLD and from 0.3 to 24.0 CFUs per D/E plate after UVLD, with significant reductions for all 5 surfaces (all P < .02). Surfaces in direct line of sight were significantly more likely to yield negative culture results after UVLD than before UVLD (all P < .001). Mean C. difficile spore log reductions ranged from 1.8 to 2.9. UVLD cycle times ranged from 34.2 to 100.1 minutes. For the 2-stage procedure, mean aerobic colony counts ranged from 10.0 to 89.2 CFUs per D/E plate before UVLD and were 0 CFUs per D/E plate after UVLD, with significant reductions for all 5 high-touch surfaces. UVLD cycle times ranged from 72.1 to 146.3 minutes. In-room ozone concentrations during UVLD ranged from undetectable to 0.012 ppm. CONCLUSIONS. The mobile UV-C light unit significantly reduced aerobic colony counts and C. difficile spores on contaminated surfaces in patient rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011; 32(8): 737-742

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据