4.4 Article

Contribution of Interfacility Patient Movement to Overall Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Prevalence Levels

期刊

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 11, 页码 1073-1078

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/662375

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [5K01AI071015-04, 1 K24 AI079040-03]
  2. Center for Health Information and Decision Systems at the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland
  3. American University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES. The effect of patient movement between hospitals and long-termcare facilities (LTCFs) on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence levels is unknown. We investigated these effects to identify scenarios that may lead to increased prevalence in either facility type. METHODS. We used a hybrid simulation model to simulate MRSA transmission among hospitals and LTCFs. Transmission within each facility was determined by mathematical model equations. The model predicted the long-term prevalence of each facility and was used to assess the effects of facility size, patient turnover, and decolonization. RESULTS. Analyses of various healthcare networks suggest that the effect of patients moving from a LTCF to a hospital is negligible unless the patients are consistently admitted to the same unit. In such cases, MRSA prevalence can increase significantly regardless of the endemic level. Hospitals can cause sustained increases in prevalence when transferring patients to LTCFs, where the population size is smaller and patient turnover is less frequent. For 1 particular scenario, the steady-state prevalence of a LTCF increased from 6.9% to 9.4% to 13.8% when the transmission rate of the hospital increased from a low to a high transmission rate. CONCLUSIONS. These results suggest that the relative facility size and the patient discharge rate are 2 key factors that can lead to sustained increases in MRSA prevalence. Consequently, small facilities or those with low turnover rates are especially susceptible to sustaining increased prevalence levels, and they become more so when receiving patients from larger, high-prevalence facilities. Decolonization is an infection-control strategy that can mitigate these effects. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011; 32(11): 1073-1078

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据