4.4 Article

Impact of Education and an Antifungal Stewardship Program for Candidiasis at a Thai Tertiary Care Center

期刊

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 722-727

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/653616

关键词

-

资金

  1. Infection Control and Infectious Diseases Research Unit, Thammasat University Hospital, Pratumthani, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. We evaluated the impact of education and an antifungal stewardship program for candidiasis on prescribing practices, antifungal consumption, Candida species infections, and estimated costs at a Thai tertiary care hospital. METHODS. A hospital-wide, quasi-experimental study was conducted for 1.5 years before the intervention and 1.5 years after the implementation of an antifungal stewardship program. Inpatient antifungal prescriptions were prospectively observed, and patients' demographic, clinical, and administrative-cost data were collected. Interventions included education, introduction of an antifungal hepatic and/or renal dose adjustment tool, antifungal prescription forms, and prescription-control strategies. RESULTS. After the intervention, there was a 59% reduction in antifungal prescriptions (from 194 to 80 prescriptions per 1,000 hospitalizations;). Inappropriate P<.001 antifungal use decreased (from 71% to 24%; P<.001), a sustained reduction in antifungal use was observed (r=0.83; P<.001), and fluconazole use decreased (from 242 to 117 defined daily doses per 1,000 patient-days; P<.001). Reductions in the incidence of infection with Candida glabrata (r=0.69; P<.001) and Candida krusei (r=0.71; P<.001) were observed, whereas the incidence of infection with Candida albicans (r = -0.81; P<.001) increased. Total cost savings were US$31,615 during the 18-month postintervention period. CONCLUSIONS. Implementation of an antifungal stewardship program was associated with appropriate antifungal drug use, improved resource utilization, and cost savings. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31(7):722-727

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据