4.4 Article

Impact of an Antimicrobial Utilization Program on Antimicrobial Use at a Large Teaching Hospital: A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 931-938

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/605924

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000448, UL1 TR000454] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [K12 RR017643, K12 RR017643-05, UL1 RR024992, UL1 RR025008, UL1 RR025008-02, UL1 RR024992-01, UL1RR024992] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [K23 AI054371, K23 AI054371-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Multidisciplinary antimicrobial utilization teams (AUTs) have been proposed as a mechanism for improving antimicrobial use, but data on their efficacy remain limited. OBJECTIVE. To determine the impact of an AUT on antimicrobial use at a teaching hospital. DESIGN. Randomized controlled intervention trial. SETTING. A 953-bed, public, university-affiliated, urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS. Patients who were given selected antimicrobial agents (piperacillin-tazobactam, levofloxacin, or vancomycin) by internal medicine ward teams. INTERVENTION. Twelve internal medicine teams were randomly assigned monthly: 6 teams to an intervention group (academic detailing by the AUT) and 6 teams to a control group that was given indication-based guidelines for prescription of broad-spectrum antimicrobials (standard of care), during a 10-month study period. MEASUREMENTS. Proportion of appropriate empirical, definitive (therapeutic), and end (overall) antimicrobial usage. RESULTS. A total of 784 new prescriptions of piperacillin-tazobactam, levofloxacin, and vancomycin were reviewed. The proportion of antimicrobial prescriptions written by the intervention teams that was considered to be appropriate was significantly higher than the proportion of antimicrobial prescriptions written by the control teams that was considered to be appropriate: 82% versus 73% for empirical (risk ratio [RR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.24), 82% versus 43% for definitive (RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.53-2.33), and 94% versus 70% for end antimicrobial usage (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.25-1.43). In multivariate analysis, teams that received feedback from the AUT alone (adjusted RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.48) or from both the AUT and the infectious diseases consultation service (adjusted RR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.64-3.19) were significantly more likely to prescribe end antimicrobial usage appropriately, compared with control teams. CONCLUSIONS. A multidisciplinary AUT that provides feedback to prescribing physicians was an effective method in improving antimicrobial use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据