4.4 Article

Natural Competence Promotes Helicobacter pylori Chronic Infection

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 209-215

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01042-12

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service [DK080894, AI054423]
  2. NIGMS [NRSA T32 007270]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Animal models are important tools for studies of human disease, but developing these models is a particular challenge with regard to organisms with restricted host ranges, such as the human stomach pathogen Helicobacter pylori. In most cases, H. pylori infects the stomach for many decades before symptoms appear, distinguishing it from many bacterial pathogens that cause acute infection. To model chronic infection in the mouse, a human clinical isolate was selected for its ability to survive for 2 months in the mouse stomach, and the resulting strain, MSD132, colonized the mouse stomach for at least 28 weeks. During selection, the cagY component of the Cag type IV secretion system was mutated, disrupting a key interaction with host cells. Increases in both bacterial persistence and bacterial burden occurred prior to this mutation, and a mixed population of cagY(+) and cagY mutant cells was isolated from a single mouse, suggesting that mutations accumulate during selection and that factors in addition to the Cag apparatus are important for murine adaptation. Diversity in both alleles and genes is common in H. pylori strains, and natural competence mediates a high rate of interstrain genetic exchange. Mutations of the Com apparatus, a membrane DNA transporter, and DprA, a cytosolic competence factor, resulted in reduced persistence, although initial colonization was normal. Thus, exchange of DNA between genetically heterogeneous H. pylori strains may improve chronic colonization. The strains and methods described here will be important tools for defining both the spectrum of mutations that promote murine adaptation and the genetic program of chronic infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据