4.4 Article

Identification of the Targets of Cross-Reactive Antibodies Induced by Streptococcus pneumoniae Colonization

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 2231-2239

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01058-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [44231, 38446]
  2. Bacterial Respiratory Pathogen Research Unit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Much of the efficacy of current pneumococcal conjugate vaccines lies in their ability to decrease carriage of vaccine serotypes in the population. Novel and more-broadly acting vaccines would also need to target carriage in order to be as effective. We have previously shown that model murine carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae can elicit antibody-dependent immunity and can protect against a virulent heterologous challenge strain. This study set out to identify S. pneumoniae surface antigens that may elicit cross-reactive antibodies following colonization. Western blot analysis using sera from colonized mice identified the previously characterized immunogens pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA), putative proteinase maturation protein A (PpmA), and pneumococcal surface adhesin A (PsaA) as such antigens. Using flow cytometry, PspA was found to be the major target of surface-bound cross-reactive IgG in sera from TIGR4 Delta cps-colonized mice, with a modest contribution from PpmA and none from PsaA. In human sera, however, only mutants lacking PpmA were shown to have reduced binding of surface IgG compared to wild-type strains, suggesting that prior exposure to S. pneumoniae in humans may induce PpmA antibodies. We also investigated if cross-reactive antibodies induced by these antigens may be cross-protective against carriage. Despite the immunogenicity of PspA, PpmA, and PsaA, mice were still protected following colonization with mutants lacking these antigens, suggesting they are not necessary for cross-protection induced by carriage. Our findings suggest that a whole-organism approach may be needed to broadly diminish carriage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据