4.4 Article

Identification and characterization of Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific proteins that activate tumour necrosis factor alpha production in RAW 264.7 murine macrophages

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 1558-1564

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01331-07

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL056036, HL56036] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI043060, AI-43060] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common respiratory pathogen, which activates macropbages to induce inflammatory cytokines that may promote atherosclerosis. However, the antigens that induce macropbage activation have not been well defined. In the current study, three chlamydial proteins which are recognized during human infection, outer membrane protein 2 (OMP2) and two 53-kDa proteins (Cpn 0980 and Cpn 0809), were investigated to determine whether they activate macrophages and, if they do, what mechanism they use for this activation. It was shown that these three proteins could (i) induce expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and tissue factor and (ii) induce phosphorylation of p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and activation of early growth response factor I (Egr-1). Control proteins, the N-terminal fragment of polymorphic membrane protein 8 and the thioredoxin portion of the fusion protein, had no effect on macrophages. Treatment of cells with a MEK1/2 inhibitor, U0126, dramatically reduced the phosphorylation of ERK, activation of Egr-1, and expression of TNF-alpha in macrophages treated with recombinant proteins. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) act as sensors for microbial antigens and can signal via the MAPK pathway. Chlamydial protein-induced expression of TNF-alpha was significantly reduced in macrophages lacking TLR2 or TLR4. These findings suggest that C pneumoniae may activate macrophages through OMP2, Cpn 0980, and Cpn 0809 in addition to cHSP60 and that activation occurs via TLR2 or TLR4, Egr-1, and MAPK pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据