4.4 Article

Vibrio parahaemolyticus inhibition of Rho family GTPase activation requires a functional chromosome I type III secretion system

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 76, 期 5, 页码 2202-2211

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01704-07

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a leading cause of seafood-borne gastroenteritis; however, its virulence mechanisms are not well understood. The identification of type III secreted proteins has provided candidate virulence factors whose functions are still being elucidated. Genotypic strain variability contributes a level of complexity to understanding the role of different virulence factors. The ability of V. parahaemolyticus to inhibit Rho family GTPases and cause cytoskeletal disruption was examined with HeLa cells. After HeLa cells were infected, intracellular Rho activation was inhibited in response to external stimuli. In vitro activation of Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 isolated from infected HeLa cell lysates was also inhibited, indicating that the bacteria were specifically targeting GTPase activation. The inhibition of Rho family GTPase activation was retained for clinical and environmental isolates of V. parahaemolyticus and was dependent on a functional chromosome I type III secretion system (CI-T3SS). GTPase inhibition was independent of hemolytic toxin genotype and the chromasome II (CII)-T3SS. Rho inhibition was accompanied by a shift in the total actin pool to its monomeric form. These phenotypes were abrogated in a mutant strain lacking the CI-T3S effector Vp1686, suggesting that the inhibiting actin polymerization may be a downstream effect of Vp1686-dependent GTPase inhibition. Although Vp1686 has been previously characterized as a potential virulence factor in macrophages, our findings reveal an effect on cultured HeLa cells. The ability to inhibit Rho family GTPases independently of the CII-T3SS and the hemolytic toxins may provide insight into the mechanisms of virulence used by strains lacking these virulence factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据