4.7 Article

A novel and accurate calibration method for cameras with large field of view using combined small targets

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 1-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.027

关键词

Computer vision; Camera; Calibration; Small target

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of PR China [51175027]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [3132029]
  3. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China [2012YQ140032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Camera calibration accuracy is directly affected by the area and precision of targets. The low precision of large targets reduces camera calibration accuracy, whereas small targets lead to poor calibration results for their small size despite the high precision. To solve the problems, this paper proposes a calibration method for cameras with a large field of view, where multiple small high-precision targets are assembled to form combined small targets (CST). The main steps of the proposed calibration method are as follows. First, multiple high-precision small planar targets are distributed in the field of view of the camera to form a CST. The camera is placed for at least twice randomly to capture the CST images. Then, the feature points of CST are automatically located, and the intrinsic parameters of the camera are calculated based on the H matrix between each of the small planar targets and the image plane. All of the feature points of CST are united together by the transformation matrices between the coordinate frames of the small targets to obtain a large three-dimensional data field. Finally, the intrinsic parameters of the camera are optimized via the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Simulation and real data experiments show that the calibration accuracy using the proposed method is close to that using a large target whose size is equal to the area enclosed by the small targets of CST, and is much better than that using a small target. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据