4.6 Article

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of 69 cases with early prosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee

期刊

INFECTION
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 511-519

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-014-0584-6

关键词

Early prosthetic joint infection; Implant retention; Treatment outcome; Biofilm; Two-stage exchange

资金

  1. Hans-Paul Walchli Foundation for Research (Lugano, Switzerland)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland) [PBZHP3_141483]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PBZHP3_141483] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be treated with an intensive surgical debridement and implant retention (DAIR) of the prosthesis if (1) the prosthesis is stable, (2) the pathogen is not a difficult-to-treat microorganism, (3) symptoms have lasted for < 3 weeks and (4) a sinus tract is absent. We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcome of early PJI in the hip and knee in a single orthopaedic centre. An early PJI was defined as a prosthesis infection within 3 months after primary implantation or revision surgery for a non-infectious cause. We identified 69 patients with confirmed early PJI, with a median age of 71 (range 33-84) years. Only 64 % presented with a parts per thousand yen2 acute signs of infection. The most commonly isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative staphylococci (38 %) and Staphylococcus aureus (25 %). Surgical procedures included DAIR (50 cases, 69 %) and two-stage exchange (19 cases, 31 %). At last follow-up, five of remaining living 67 patients (7.5 %) had a relapse of infection. The overall relapse-free survival of the prosthesis after 2 years was 92.3 % (95 % confidence interval 82-97 %) with no significant difference between DAIR and exchange of prosthesis. Our data suggest that an early PJI should be treated with DAIR as a less invasive procedure whenever possible according to the established treatment algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据