4.3 Article

Investigation of path compensation methods for robotic friction stir welding

期刊

INDUSTRIAL ROBOT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 601-608

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED
DOI: 10.1108/01439911211268813

关键词

Automotive industry; Robotics; Friction welding; Industrial robotics; Friction stir welding; Path compensation; Seam tracking; Force

资金

  1. Vinnova (Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - Friction stir welding (FSW) is a novel method for joining materials without using consumables and without melting the materials. The purpose of this paper is to present the state of the art in robotic FSW and outline important steps for its implementation in industry and specifically the automotive industry. Design/methodology/approach - This study focuses on the robot deflections during FSW, by relating process forces to the deviations from the programmed robot path and to the strength of the obtained joint. A robot adapted for the FSW process has been used in the experimental study. Two sensor-based methods are implemented to determine path deviations during test runs and the resulting welds were examined with respect to tensile strength and path deviation. Findings - It can be concluded that deflections must be compensated for in high strengths alloys. Several strategies can be applied including online sensing or compensation of the deflection in the robot program. The welding process was proven to be insensitive for small deviations and the presented path compensation methods are sufficient to obtain a strong and defect-free welding joint. Originality/value - This paper demonstrates the effect of FSW process forces on the robot, which is not found in literature. This is expected to contribute to the use of robots for FSW. The experiments were performed in a demonstrator facility which clearly showed the possibility of applying robotic FSW as a flexible industrial manufacturing process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据