4.5 Article

Innovation with IS usage: individual absorptive capacity as a mediator

期刊

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS
卷 114, 期 8, 页码 1110-1130

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0160

关键词

Absorptive capacity; Business intelligence systems; Fairness of rewards; Information system innovation; Job autonomy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71201039, 71172157, 70971031, 71371059]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014M550198]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT. HSS. 201205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - After information systems (IS) implementation, many organizations report that system underutilization causes the failure to meet expected IS investment returns. It is imperative to understand the way to leverage employees' fullest potential in the IS usage. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - Anchoring on absorptive capacity (ACAP) theory, the authors develop an employee innovation model. Using survey data and structural equation modeling, this research investigates how perceived organizational levers affect innovation with IS usage (INVU) by introducing individual ACAP as a mediator. Findings - The authors find general support for the research model through a survey of 205 employees using SAP business intelligence systems in China. The empirical data shows that three interrelated components of individual ACAP significantly contribute to INVU. The findings also suggest that, both fairness of reward and job autonomy are key organizational levers for the utility of individual ACAP. Furthermore, their effects on INVU can be fully mediated by individual ACAP. Originality/value - The authors empirically unpack and validate individual ACAP in IS innovation situation. The findings provide academics and practitioners with an understanding of how management can inspire employees' potential in implemented system innovation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据