4.1 Article

Health-related Quality of Life and Its Main Related Factors among Nurses in China

期刊

INDUSTRIAL HEALTH
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 158-165

出版社

NATL INST OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH, JAPAN
DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.MS1160

关键词

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL); Occupational stress; Job burnout; Coping resource; Nurses; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81001238]
  2. University of Fujian Province, China [JA10124]
  3. Science Foundation of Education Office of Fujian Province of China [JA07090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study is to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL.) and analyze the effect of occupational stress, job burnout and coping resource on the HRQOL among nurses in China. A total of 1,012 nurses were recruited from eight hospitals of two provinces in 2008. The Chinese version of Short Form-36 Health Survey and Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey were used to measure the HRQOL. and burnout respectively, the Occupation Stress Inventory-Revised Edition was used to evaluate occupational stressor, personal strain and coping resources. Other potential influencing factors for HRQOL, were collected using a structured questionnaire. HRQOL, in the nurses was lower than that in the general population. Occupational stressor, personal strain and job burnout correlated negatively with the HRQOL, (p < 0.05) while coping resources was positively related to the HRQOL, (p < 0.05). Among the predictive factors for HRQOL. occupational stressor (indicated by role insufficiency and physical environment), personal strain (indicated by physical strain and psychological strain), job burnout (indicated by emotional exhaustion and professional efficacy), length or work hours (10 h per day), diet irregularity and age were the main risk factors for HRQOL, while recreation and self-care were the main protective factors for HRQOL. The findings suggest occupational stress,.job burnout and coping resources play important roles in HRQOL. in the Chinese nurses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据