4.7 Article

A new cost-effective approach for lavender essential oils quality assessment

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 241-247

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.09.010

关键词

Lavandula angustifolia; Essential oils; Volatile organic compounds; Quality indicators; Quality scale; Chemometrics

资金

  1. Ministry of Research and Innovation, Core Program [PN 18 03 02 02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existing methods used to evaluate the lavender oils quality, is related generally to the percentage abundance of the specific compounds (linalool, linalyl acetate). The strict monitoring of these products was considered mandatory, for all involved counterparts (producers, consumers, and control authorities). A new reliable approach for the quality of lavender oils assessment is presented in this work. For this purpose, 31 volatile organic compounds were quantified using GC/MS system in 32 lavender oil samples, purchased from local stores and autochthon producers. Cluster analysis split the samples set in two main clusters based on volatile components. These results combined with those obtained by applying linear discriminant analysis allowed the identification of four commercial samples which were adulterated by addition of lower quality oil. The quality grades for every product were achieved applying the new developed algorithm, using the correlation between two calculated indicators: percentage abundance of the linalool and linalyl acetate and sum of all volatile organic compounds peak areas. The new algorithm, confirmed with chemometric models, allowed the classification of lavender oils as high, medium or low quality, without using the time consuming and expensive techniques such as quantitative analysis. The new developed approach presented also a very good correlation with quantitative analysis in terms of linalool. Therefore, the proposed model, constitute a robust, economical and fast method for quality determination of lavender oils and offer the possibility to be extended to other essential oils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据