4.7 Article

Winter camelina seed yield and quality responses to harvest time

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 765-775

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.025

关键词

Fatty acid composition; Physiological maturity; Oil content; Seed moisture; Yield; Winter camelina

资金

  1. Walton Family Foundation
  2. Forever Green Initiative
  3. MDA Crop Research program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Winter camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is an winter-annual oilseed crop that offers the potential for producing a second crop in the Upper Midwest. However, little is known about changes in oil, fatty acid (FA) composition and protein content as seeds mature in the field, nor the best harvest time to maximize winter camelina seed yield and quality. Therefore, a study was conducted in 2016-2017 at two locations Morris and Rosemount, Minnesota, to determine the changes in seed yield and quality from the beginning of seed-set to full maturity in winter camelina. Plant growth, seed yield and seed quality traits were evaluated over eight harvest dates ranging from early June through early July. Seed yield and oil content at both locations did not change significantly after mid-June corresponding to 1200-1300 degrees C d cumulative growing degree days, which resemble closely with maximum seed carbon and protein content. As the harvest date progresses, contents of seed linoleic, oleic and palmitic acids declined, while that of linolenic and eicosenoic acids increased, reaching their stable levels by physiological maturity. At maximum seed mass (i.e., physiological maturity), moisture content was estimated to be 410 g kg(-1), which could be used as an indicator of when to swath or desiccate to hasten harvest. Results indicated that seed yield and oil content of winter camelina maximized by mid-June, before the crop reached physiological maturity in Minnesota. However, an additional 150-250 degrees C d was required to dry seed enough for ease of harvesting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据