4.7 Article

Valorisation of Mangifera indica crop biomass residues

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 284-293

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.028

关键词

Mangifera indica L.; Metabolic profiling; Antioxidant; Antidiabetic; Cytotoxic

资金

  1. National Funds (FCT/MEC, Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia/Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia) [UID/QUI/50006/2013]
  2. European Union (FEDER)
  3. Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000024]
  4. Programa de Cooperacion Interreg V-A Espana - Portugal (POCTEP) 2014-2020 [0377_IBERPHENOL_6_E]
  5. European Union (EU)
  6. FCT [SFRH/BPD/96819/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mangifera indica L. is one of the most important commercial plants worldwide in terms of production, marketing and consumption. Although the fruit is widely studied, few works focus other vegetal materials, which could be excellent sources of metabolites with potential application in several industries. Additionally, some M. indica varieties remain unstudied. The aim of this work was to explore for the first time the chemical composition and the biological properties of aqueous extracts from M. indica var. Nunkourouni leaf and stem bark. Malic and quinic acids were the most abundant organic acids. Mangiferin and gallic acid were the main phenolics in stem bark and leaves, respectively. A concentration-dependent activity was noticed against several reactive species, stem bark displaying stronger antioxidant capacity. The two materials also inhibit alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase, leaves being more potent. The cytotoxic effects on AGS cells were also approached, leaves being the most active material. The results suggest that M. indica leaf and stem bark could be valuable sources of bioactive compounds, contributing to the valorisation of these materials and their further application in high prevalence diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据