4.7 Article

Characterization of fennel extracts and quantification of estragole: Optimization and comparison of accelerated solvent extraction and Soxhlet techniques

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 528-536

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.11.028

关键词

Foeniculum vulgare Miller; Estragole; ASE; Soxhlet; Box-Behnken design

资金

  1. FEDER funds of the European Union [CTQ2011-28967]
  2. Education Ministry of Spanish Government [EX-2010-0402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Miller) is an aromatic plant used, among other applications, in the production of traditional herbal liqueurs. In this study, essential oils from fennel were extracted applying two techniques, Soxhlet and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE). The extracts obtained were characterized by GC-MS. Taking into account that estragole is the major constituent of fennel and due to recent studies pointed out its possible carcinogenic properties; this compound was also quantified by GC-FID. The quantification method showed good linearity (r(2) = 0.998) and precision (RSD<5%) with low values of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) limits. A Box-Behnken design was used to correlate three independent variables (temperature, contact time sample-solvent and number of cycles) with the amount of estragole extracted. Meanwhile, the response surface methodology was applied to optimize the extraction of estragole by ASE. The optimal conditions were 125 degrees C, 7 min and 3 cycles. On the other hand, the Soxhlet technique was studied step-by-step. Two variables were optimized: time (4 and 8 h) and solvents, according to their polarity. Methanol and 4 h of extraction showed the best results both qualitatively and quantitatively. The Soxhlet technique provided higher performance of extraction and greater amounts of compounds extracted compared to ASE, but similar concentration of estragole. The shorter time of extraction and the lower amount of solvent used justify the ASE technique choice to characterize fennel essential oils. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据