4.7 Article

Chemical constituents and biological activities of the Purple Perilla essential oil against Lasioderma serricorne

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 331-337

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.07.021

关键词

Lasioderma serricorne; Purple Perilla; Contact toxicity; Fumigant toxicity; Repellency; Essential oil composition

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81374069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purple Perilla (Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt.) is an annual herb commonly used as a traditional Chinese medicine for more than 1000 years. This work investigated the chemical composition, insecticidal and repellent activities of the essential oil of Purple Perilla aerial parts against Lasioderma serricorne (Fabricius). Moreover, we also isolated active constituents from the essential oil. The experiment was investigated in 2013 in Beijing. The essential oil of Purple Perilla was obtained by hydrodistillation and a total of 47 components in the essential oil were identified with GC-MS. It was found that the main compounds included carvone (32.55%), perilla aldehyde (20.52%), caryophyllene (9.85%), 2-furyl methyl ketone (7.53%), 2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-2-norpinene (5.17%), and beta-terpinyl acetate (3.41%). With a further isolation, four active constituents were obtained from the essential oil and identified as R-(+)-carvone, perilla aldehyde, 2-furyl methyl ketone, and beta-caryophyllene. In the progress of assay, it showed that the essential oil, R-(+)-carvone, perilla aldehyde, and 2-furyl methyl ketone exhibited stronger insecticidal and repellent activities against L. serricorne than beta-caryophyllene. The results indicate that the essential oil of Purple Perilla aerial parts and isolated compounds have potential for development into natural insecticides or repellents for control of insects in stored products. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据