4.7 Article

Analysis of the bioactive components of Sapindus saponins

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 422-429

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.07.026

关键词

Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn; Bioactive; Graded; Antimicrobial activity; Antineoplastic activity

资金

  1. key project of transformation and industrialization of scientific and technological achievement in Fujian Province [2012N3008]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of People' Republic of China [21203076]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [sklssm 201328]
  4. Jiangsu province science and technology support program for social development [BE2012631]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51309A]
  6. National Key Technology R&D Program in the 12th Five year Plan of China [2012BAD36B02, 2014BAD04B03]
  7. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pericarp of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn was used as raw material to extract crude saponin for the preparation of graded samples (fraction a-fraction g). The peak area revealed high total saponin content in fraction g. Based on molecular weights and peak appearance times, we speculated that the main components of total saponins of S. mukorossi Gaertn. include Sapindoside B, Sapindoside A, Mukurozisaponin E1, Sapindoside L, Mukurozi-saponin G and Sapindoside M. Analysis of the antibacterial and antineoplastic activities of different grade products showed that S. mukorossi Gaertn. and sesquiterpene glycosides display strong antimicrobial activity against dermatophytes, but not bacteria. The ethyl acetate extract displayed strong activity against both bacteria and dermatophytes, presenting blue fluorescence under UV light. In addition, the saponin mixture from S. mukorossi Gaertn. exerted a significant inhibitory effect on growth of the human breast cancer cell line, MCF-7, in vitro. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据