4.7 Article

The chemical composition of exhausted coffee waste

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 423-429

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.056

关键词

Exhausted coffee; Chemical composition; Extractives; Polyphenols; Tannins; FTIR

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTM2010-15185, CTM2008-06776-C02-01]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte [MHE2011-00258]
  3. Universitat de Girona [BR 10/09]
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council [[2011] 3005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemical composition of exhausted coffee waste generated in a soluble coffee industry was investigated. The chemical characterization included elemental analysis, mineral composition and ash content, summative composition; acidic functional groups, lipophilic extractives, total polyphenols, condensed tannins determination and FTIR analysis. The spent coffee samples showed high carbon (>58%), low nitrogen (<2%), and low ash (<1%) contents and low polarity coefficient (O + N)/C (<0.5). The summative composition reveals that extractives are the main components of exhausted coffee wastes (54%). This percentage includes lipophilic fractions (24%), ethanol and water soluble compounds (5%), and compounds solubilized in 1% NaOH (26%). Lignin and polysaccharides were found in a similar proportion between 20 and 26%. The GC analysis of monosaccharide showed about 60% glucose and 40% mannose. The main components in the lipophilic extractives are free fatty acids (>60%) of which more than 30% was identified to be n-hexadecanoic acid. Total polyphenols and tannins represent <6% and <4% of the exhausted coffee wastes, respectively. Assignments of the bands of the obtained FTIR spectra confirm the presence of lipids, polysaccharides and chlorogenic acid. Exhausted coffee wastes showed characteristics for various potential applications such as biodiesel production, as a source of antioxidants and as a biosorbent of hydrophobic pollutants. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据