4.7 Article

Physicochemical properties of soy protein adhesives modified by 2-octen-1-ylsuccinic anhydride

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 165-172

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.01.024

关键词

Soy protein adhesive; Succinic anhydride; Turbidity; Thermal properties; Water resistance

资金

  1. USDA Critical Agricultural Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soy protein adhesives (SPA) with high solid content display great potential as alternatives to petroleum-based adhesives. This study investigated the adhesive properties of SPA as modified by 2-octen-1-ylsuccinic anhydride (USA) at different concentrations. Physicochemical properties including electrophoresis profile and turbidity and thermal and rheological properties also were characterized in detail. USA was grafted to some soy protein molecules through a reaction between amine, hydroxyl groups of protein, and anhydride groups as confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The conformation of USA-modified SPA was unfolded as indicated by the absence of high molecular weight protein bands in reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and by the decrease in thermal stability detected by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The turbidity of USA-modified SPA decreased at pH basic to isoelectrical point (IP) but increased at pH acidic to IP. The wet strength of SPA applied on two ply plywood increased to 3.2 MPa at 3.5% USA concentration compared to 1.8 MPa for the control; then the strength leveled off as USA concentration increased further. SPA modified with 3.5% USA worked better on maple wood veneer than yellow poplar wood veneer when three ply plywood was made. Wood cohesive failure (WCF) was observed for both soaked maple and yellow poplar plywood specimens: 60% WCF for the former and 5% WCF for the latter. The oily nature and hydrophobic long alkyl chains are the main reasons to improve the adhesion performance of SPA. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据