4.7 Article

Antifeedant activity of plant extracts on Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say. and Spodoptera littoralis Bois. larvae

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 213-219

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.04.010

关键词

Spodoptera littoralis; Leptinotarsa decemlineata; Antifeedant activity; Botanical insecticides; Plant extracts; Angelica archangelica; Imperatoria ostruthium; Psoralea bituminosa; Vincetoxicum hirundinaria; Grindelia camporum; Inula auriculata

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [ME09079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antifeedant activities of methanol extracts obtained from 75 plant species of the Eurasian region were assessed on Spodoptera littoralis and Leptinotarsa decemlineata larvae. Significant differences in antifeedant activity were found in the highest tested close of 500 mu g/cm(2), not only among individual extracts but also between both pest species tested. S. littoralis larvae were less sensitive to the extracts, when 43 extracts showed antifeedant activity lower than 50%, and an effectiveness in the range of 50-95% was found in 13 extracts. Out of all tested extracts, only the extracts obtained from the plants Angelica archangelica, Imperatoria ostruthium, Psoralea bituminosa and Vincetoxicum hirundinaria showed antifeedant activity higher than 95%, and their effective doses (ED50) were estimated as 44, 34, 72 and 11 mu g/cm(2), respectively. L. decemlineata larvae were very sensitive to all the tested extracts. Only 15 extracts showed antifeedant effectiveness lower than 50%. The highest number of extracts (42) showed effectiveness in the range of 50-95%. 23 extracts were chosen for subsequent tests; antifeedant effectiveness higher than 95% was determined for these extracts. Out of 23 extracts, 3 extracts obtained from A. archangelica, Grindelia camporum and Inula auriculata showed the highest effectiveness, when ED50 lower than 1 mu g/cm(2). (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据