4.7 Article

Supercritical carbon dioxide and hexane extraction of wax from triticale straw: Content, composition and thermal properties

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 550-556

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.02.011

关键词

Triticosecale; Triticale; Straw; Wax; Sterols; Composition; Supercritical carbon dioxide; DSC; Melting point; FT-IR; Hexane

资金

  1. Canadian Biomass Innovation Network (CBIN)
  2. Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wax and other lipophilic compounds of triticale straw were extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) and hexane. Extraction with SC-CO2 was carried out at 70 C and a flow rate of 50 g/min at different pressures (250, 300, 350 and 400 bar) for 90 min. The yield, composition, thermal properties, and spectral features of triticale wax obtained by SC-CO2 extraction were compared with those obtained using Soxhlet extraction with hexane. The major compounds extracted with SC-CO2 and hexane from triticale straw were fatty acids (30.4-34.1%), fatty alcohols (4.8-7.4%), alkanes (7.2-8.3%), sterols (11.3-13.6%), hydroxyl-beta-diketones (5.78-11.9%), and, beta-diketones (18.2-26.9%). The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of each wax were considerably different. SC-CO2 and hexane extracts shared similar thermal properties, while commercial waxes showed several small peaks over a broad temperature range, indicating their eutectic nature. In contrast, purified wax from SC-CO2 (obtained at 300 bar) showed a single, sharp, narrow peak at 53 C. Triticale wax had a higher melting point and good oxidative stability. In addition, it shared similar key thermal and spectral features with commercial waxes. The triticale wax extracted residue (dewaxed straw) obtained using SC-CO2 was composed mainly of glycans (60.4%), lignins (18.3%), ash (7.2%), acetyls (2.1%), uronic acids (1.5%) and unidentified compounds (14.1%). (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据