4.7 Article

Seed filling patterns of safflower: Genotypic and seasonal variations and association with other agronomic traits

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 71-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.09.014

关键词

Carthamus tinctorius; Seed filling duration; Seed filling rate; Yield; Oil content

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) plants grown under Mediterranean environments are subjected to several biotic and abiotic stresses during the seed filling period that limit their production. The genotypic and seasonal variation in seed filling parameters and their association with agronomic traits were investigated in field experiments conducted for 2 years. A set of 10 safflower genotypes. which included hybrids and open pollinated varieties, was used. Seed filling rate (mg head(-1) day(-1)) and duration (days) were calculated by using the cubic polynomial model. Data obtained indicated that this model could be successfully used to simulate the seed growth and to estimate the seed filling parameters in safflower genotypes with high coefficients of determination (r(2)) that ranged from 0.901 to 0.999. Seasonal differences were observed only for seed filling duration that was mainly determined by the sink size, as it was specified by the number of seeds per head. Greater sink size induced by higher head fertility (number of seeds per head) resulted in a longer seed filling duration. Genotypes differed greatly in seed filling rate. Seed yield and seed oil yield were significantly correlated with seed filling rate. More than 57% of the variation among genotypes in seed yield was due to the corresponding variation in seed filling rate.. Increased seed filling rate improved dry matter partitioning to the seeds contributing to a higher harvest index. Results indicate that selection of genotypes with high seed filling rate could be a successful strategy to increase production of safflower grown under Mediterranean environments. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据