4.6 Article

Modeling Water Containing Systems with the Simplified PC-SAFT and CPA Equations of State

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 37, 页码 14493-14507

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie501993y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation (DNATF)
  2. Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous studies have been presented for modeling of water containing systems with the perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory (PC-SAFT) equation of state (EOS), and more than 20 water parameter sets have been published with emphasis on different applications. In this work, eight of these sets and new estimated parameters with different association schemes are systematically compared on describing properties of pure water, the liquid-liquid equilibria (LLE) of water with hydrocarbons, and the vapor-liquid (VLE) and/or vapor-liquid-liquid equilibria (VLLE) of water with 1-alcohols. An interactive procedure is further proposed for including the LLE of water with hydrocarbons into the pure fluid parameter estimation. The results show that it is possible for PC-SAFT to give an accurate description of the LLE of water and hydrocarbons while retaining satisfactory accuracy for both vapor pressure and saturated liquid density of water. For the aforementioned aqueous systems, the PC-SAFT correlations using the newly developed parameters are compared with the corresponding correlations of the cubic plus association EOS. The two models show comparable results for phase equilibria, and both of them fail to describe second-order derivative properties of water, i.e., residual isochoric heat capacity and speed of sound. The ability of the models to predict the monomer (free site) fractions of saturated pure water is investigated and discussed from various aspects. The results suggest that more experimental or theoretical studies are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据