4.6 Article

Standing, Obesity, and Metabolic Syndrome: Findings From the Cooper Center Longitudinal Study

期刊

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
卷 90, 期 11, 页码 1524-1532

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.022

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the cross-sectional relationships between standing time, obesity, and metabolic syndrome alongside and independent of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA). Participants and Methods: The primary study sample consisted of 7075 adult patients (aged 20-79 years) from Cooper Clinic (Dallas, Texas). In this cross-sectional study we assessed the associations between reported standing time and directly measured obesity (body mass index >= 30), elevated waist circumference (men: >= 102 cm; women: >= 88 cm), body fat percentage (men: >= 25%; women >= 30%), and metabolic syndrome (yes/no). In addition, the joint associations of standing and LTPA on each outcome were examined. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for confounders was used for statistical analyses. Results: Standing a quarter of the time or more was significantly associated with reduced odds of an elevated body fat percentage in men (P < .001) and a reduced likelihood of obesity (P < .009) and abdominal obesity (P = .04) in women. In addition, joint association analyses indicated that compared with the reference group (ie, not meeting the physical activity guidelines/standing almost none of the time), men and women who met the physical activity guidelines had lower odds of all obesity outcomes and metabolic syndrome with incremental additions of standing time (ie, a dose-response relationship). Conclusion: Standing a quarter of the time per day or more is associated with reduced odds of obesity. The inverse relationship of standing to obesity and metabolic syndrome is more robust when combined with health-promoting LTPA. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and establish a causal relationship. (C) 2015 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据