4.6 Article

Quantitative Analyses of Lignin Hydrothermolysates from Subcritical Water and Water-Ethanol Systems

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 25, 页码 10328-10334

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie5011178

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31270626, 31170547, 31270627, 31370580]
  2. Science Foundation of Shandong Province [Y2007B13, ZR2010CM65, ZR2011CM011]
  3. Outstanding Young Scientist Fund of Shandong province [BS2013NJ014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present research relates a universally practical and feasible approach toward chemically deconstructing the macromolecular architecture of lignin, specifically alkali lignin (AL), for the production of a number of valuable side-stream aromatic nuclei byproducts. The hydrothermolysates obtained at different subcritical conditions were tentatively qualitatively identified by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and subsequently quantified by gas chromatography (GC). The influence of temperature (220-340 degrees C), residence time (0-60 min), and ethanol volume-% in a water ethanol cosolvent (0-100%) on the conversion of AL and the yield of the side-stream (liquid) products were explored. The results show that the yield and identity of the phenolic and methoxy-benzene compounds were strongly correlated to the conversion temperature and the ethanol volume-%, whereas residence time in the autoclave had only a minor influence. The following individual chemicals (mg liquid side-stream/g lignin) and associated yields were determined from the optimal hydrothermal conditions (30 min, 310 degrees C, 25% ethanol): phenol (4.25 mg/g), 1-methylguaiacol (2.93 mg/g), 3,5-dimethoxyacetophenone (0.78 mg/g), 1,2,4-trimethoxybenzene (2.47 mg/g), and 2,6-dihydroxy-4-methoxyacetophenone (2.47 mg/g). The highest yield of guaiacol (11.87 mg/g) and 2,6-dimethoxyphenol (12.17 mg/g) was obtained at a reaction temperature of 310 degrees C over 60 min in neat water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据