4.6 Article

Cellobiose Decomposition in Hot-Compressed Water: Importance of Isomerization Reactions

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 47, 页码 17006-17014

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie403140q

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre for Research into Energy for Sustainable Transport (CREST) through the Western Australian Government Centre of Excellence Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports an investigation on the fundamental reaction mechanism of cellobiose decomposition in hot-compressed water (HCW) using a continuous reactor system at 225-275 degrees C. The importance of isomerization reactions to form two cellobiose isomers (i.e., cellobiulose and glucosyl-mannose) as the primary reaction products is clearly demonstrated under the reaction conditions, using a high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection and mass spectrometry (HPAEC-PAD-MS). The results also confirm another two primary reactions take place during cellobiose decomposition in HCW: retro-aldol condensation reaction to produce glucosyl-erythrose (GE) and glycolaldehyde, and hydrolysis reaction to produce glucose. The data show that isomerization and retro-aldol condensation are the dominant primary reactions while hydrolysis of cellobiose is only a minor primary reaction (accounting for similar to 10-20% of cellobiose decomposition depending on reaction temperature). The results indicate that the reaction solution becomes acidic at the early stage of cellobiose decomposition, most likely due to the formation of organic acids, resulting in the subsequent reactions exhibiting more characteristics of acid-catalyzed reactions. The results further suggest that the formed acidic condition has little catalytic effects on the primary reactions of cellobiose decomposition, but is effective in catalyzing secondary reactions of various reaction intermediates such as hydrolysis and dehydration reactions to form glucose and 5-HMF, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据