4.6 Article

Improving the Stability of Immobilized Penicillin G Acylase via the Modification of Supports With Ionic Liquids

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 4582-4590

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie202745c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21136009, 21106162]
  2. Innovative Research Group [20221603]
  3. National Technology Research and Development Program of China [2009CB219904]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering [SKL-ChE-11A04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the aim of improving the stability of penicillin G acylase (PGA), functional ionic liquids (ILs) were used to modify the surface chemistry of the supports on which they were physically adsorbed. Four kinds of ILs-specifically, 1-methyl-3-(triethoxysilylpropyl)-imidazolium salts, with Cl-, BF4-, PF6-, and Tf2N- as the anions (IL-Cl-, BF4-, PF6-, and Tf2N-, respectively)-were used to tune the hydrophilic or hydrophobic properties of the ILs. The synthesized ILs were first immobilized on magnetic silica nanoparticles (Fe3O4/SiO2), and the composite material (Fe3O4/SiO2-IL) was then applied to immobilize PGA via physical adsorption. The amount of protein loading, the specific activity, the immobilization yield, and the stability of immobilized PGA were investigated to evaluate the effects of the Its on the PGA immobilization. The results showed that PGA immobilized on Fe3O4/SiO2-ILs was more stable than that immobilized on Fe3O4/SiO2 with no IL modification. Among the four kinds of ILs tested, the hydrophilic ILs (IL-Cl-, and IL-BF4-) were superior to the hydrophobic ones (IL-PF6-, and IL-Tf2N-) for PGA immobilization. The reusability of the immobilized PGA on Fe3O4/SiO2-IL (BF4-) was evaluated; a high residual activity (70% of the initial activity) was observed after 9 consecutive operation cycles under the experimental conditions. This activity was 1.8 times higher than that of immobilized PGA on naked Fe3O4/SiO2 (40%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据