4.6 Article

Novel Unsaturated Aliphatic Polyesters: Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties of Multiblock Copolymers Composing of Poly(Butylene Fumarate) and Poly(1,2-Propylene Succinate)

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 43, 页码 14107-14114

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie301994z

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Fund of China [21104087]
  2. Cultivation Project of Institute of Chemistry Chinese Academy of Science (ICCAS) [CMS-PY-201239]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Widespread application of biodegradable polyesters is restrained by various disadvantages such as inadequate thermomechanical properties, high cost, and lack of reactive sites for further modification. Poly(butylene fumarate) (PBF), as a novel and low-cost aliphatic polyester, possesses good physical properties and reactive double bonds along with the polymer backbones which can be potentially modified to endow the polyester with specific properties. However, the biodegradation rate of PBF is too slow to meet the requirement of practical application. In this contribution, amorphous poly(1,2-propylene succinate) (PPS) was copolymerized with PBF to decrease the crystallinity (X-c) and accelerate the biodegradability of PBF via chain-extension with diisocyanate. The chemical structures of the copolymers were confirmed by H-1 NMR spectra and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The crystal structure and physicochemical properties were investigated by wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), mechanical testing, and enzymatic degradation in detail. Both the impact strength and degradation rate of the copolymers are effectively improved by the introduction of amorphous PPS; while the melting point (T-m) and crystallization temperature (T-c) are hardly reduced by the incorporation of PPS. The novel polymer may be directed used as low-cost biodegradable materials or be further functionalized with special properties for particular applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据