4.6 Article

Surface Functionalization of Chitosan Nanospheres via Surface-Initiated AGET ATRP Mediated by Iron Catalyst in the Presence of Limited Amounts of Air

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 13, 页码 6216-6223

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie801935p

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20874069, 50803044]
  2. Science and Technology Development Planning of Jiangsu Province [BK2007702, BK2007048]
  3. International Cooperation Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BZ2007037]
  4. Pre-research Project of Soochow University
  5. Program of Innovative Research Team of Suzhou University
  6. Qing Lan Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method of surface modification of solids was first developed via iron(III)-mediated atom transfer radical polymerization with activators generated by electron transfer (AGET ATRP) on the surfaces of chitosan nanospheres (CTSNSs) with an average diameter of 80 nm using FeCl3 center dot 6H(2)O as the catalyst, PPh3 as the ligand, and ascorbic acid (VC) as the reducing agent in the presence of it limited amount of air. The homopolymer poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and amphiphilic block copolymer poly(methyl methacrylate)-b-poly(poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate) (PMMA-b-P(PEGMA)) were grafted onto the surfaces of the CTSNSs. Well-defined polymer chains were grown front the CTSNS surfaces to yield individual nanospheres composed of a chitosan core and a well-defined, densely grafted outer PMMA or PMMA-b-P(PEGMA) layer. The kinetics of surface-initiated AGET ATRP of MMA in the presence of a limited amount of air was investigated. A linear kinetic plot for the homopolymer, linear increase of molecular weight (M-n) with conversion, and linear plot of grafted percentage verse time were observed. The chemical composition of the nanosphere surfaces at different surface modification stages was validated by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据