4.6 Article

Production of syngas by CO2 reforming on MxLa1-xNi0.3Al0.7O3-d (M = Li, Na, K) catalysts

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 16, 页码 5892-5898

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie800111e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper deals with the effect of modification with alkali metals (Li, Na, K) in MxLa1-xNi0.3Al0.7O3-d (X = 0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0) mixed-oxide perovskites as catalysts for the dry reforming of methane to produce syngas. The perovskite-type oxides have been synthesized by a sol-gel method using propionic acid as solvent and have been characterized by techniques such as Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR), Bruner Emmet Teller surface area (BET), spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), temperature programmed reduction (TPR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS), and carbon analysis (CA). Characterization of the MxLa1-xNi0.3Al0.7O3-d samples has shown that by applying this synthetic method it is possible to obtain highly crystalline, homogeneous, and pure solids with well-defined structures. However, when lanthanum was replaced by potassium or lithium, the reduction temperature was increased and the reaction temperature had to be increased to obtain good activity. After establishment of the optimal catalytic and experimental conditions, the selected catalysts did not show significant deactivation even after 15 h on stream, maintaining their activity and selectivity in the production of synthesis gas. Among all catalysts, Li0.2La0.8Ni0.3Al0.7O2.8 showed less coke formation; Na0.5La0.5Ni0.3Al0.7O2.5 showed high yield; and K0.5La0.5Ni0.3Al0.7O2.5 produced an H-2/CO ratio close to I over a wide temperature range. These catalysts showed the best activities in lithium-, sodium-, and potassium-promoted series, respectively. In reactivity tests, methane conversions in excess of 90% and selectivities for H-2 UP to 80% at 850 degrees C under 1 atm have been achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据