4.6 Article

Ozone reaction with clothing and its initiated VOC emissions in an environmental chamber

期刊

INDOOR AIR
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 49-58

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12058

关键词

Ozone; Volatile organic compounds; Air quality; Environmental factors; Secondary emissions; Surface reactions; Skin oil

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720100]
  2. Center for Cabin Air Reformative Environment (CARE) at Tianjin University, China
  3. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office of Aerospace Medicine through the National Air Transportation Center of Excellence for Research in the Intermodal Transport Environment at Purdue University [10-C-RITE-PU]
  4. FAA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human health is adversely affected by ozone and the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced from its reactions in the indoor environment. Hence, it is important to characterize the ozone-initiated reactive chemistry under indoor conditions and study the influence of different factors on these reactions. This investigation studied the ozone reactions with clothing through a series of experiments conducted in an environmental chamber under various conditions. The study found that the ozone reactions with a soiled (human-worn) T-shirt consumed ozone and generated VOCs. The ozone removal rate and deposition velocity for the T-shirt increased with the increasing soiling level and air change rate, decreased at high ozone concentrations, and were relatively unaffected by the humidity. The deposition velocity for the soiled T-shirt ranged from 0.15 to 0.29cm/s. The ozone-initiated VOC emissions included C6-C10 straight-chain saturated aldehydes, acetone, and 4-OPA (4-oxopentanal). The VOC emissions were generally higher at higher ozone, humidity, soiling of T-shirt, and air change rate. The total molar yield was approximately 0.5 in most cases, which means that for every two moles of ozone removed by the T-shirt surface, one mole of VOCs was produced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据