4.4 Article

On the use of the multiple scale method in solving difficult' bifurcation problems

期刊

MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 988-1004

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1081286515616053

关键词

Bifurcation analysis; perturbation methods; defective eigenvalues; parametric stabilization; relaxation oscillations; nonlinear energy sinks

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University: PRIN [2010MBJK5B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several algorithms consisting in non-standard' versions of the Multiple Scale Method are illustrated for difficult' bifurcation problems. Preliminary, the easy' case of bifurcation from a cluster of distinct eigenvalues is addressed, which requires using integer power expansions, and it leads to bifurcation equations all of the same order. Then, more complex problems are studied. The first class concerns bifurcation from a defective eigenvalue, which calls for using fractional power expansions and fractional time-scales, as well as Jordan or Keldysh chains. The second class regards the interaction between defective and non-defective eigenvalues. This problem also requires fractional powers, but it leads to differential equations which are of a different order for the involved amplitudes. Both autonomous and parametrically excited non-autonomous systems are studied. Moreover, the transition from a codimension-3 to a codimension-2 bifurcation is explained. As a third class of problems, singular systems possessing an evanescent mass, as Nonlinear Energy Sinks, are considered, and both autonomous systems undergoing Hopf bifurcation and non-autonomous systems under external resonant excitation, are studied. The algorithm calls for a suitable combination of the Multiple Scale Method and the Harmonic Balance Method, the latter is applied exclusively to the singular equations. Several applications are shown, to test the effectiveness of the proposed methods. They include discrete and continuous systems, autonomous, parametrically and externally excited systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据