4.3 Article

Influence of culture vessel characteristics and agitation rate on gaseous exchange, hydrodynamic stress, and growth of embryogenic cork oak (Quercus suber L.) cultures

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11627-011-9399-7

关键词

Bioreactors; Cork oak; Quercus suber; Somatic embryos; Shake flask; Dissolved oxygen; SFI; K(L)a

资金

  1. Spanish National RD Program [AGL2007-66345-CO02-01]
  2. INIA
  3. IMIDRA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Somatic embryogenesis can be induced in the leaves of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) trees. The use of this propagation system in multivarietal forestry requires the mass production of cloned plants at low cost. Investigations were made into the influence of three types of Erlenmeyer flask and three orbiting speeds (60, 110, and 160 rpm) on oxygen transfer rate (K-L a), the shear force index (SFI), biomass production, and the proliferation of embryogenic clumps (EMCs) in cultures during the proliferation phase. K-L a varied between 0.11 and 1.47 h(-1) without biomass production being limited by oxygen availability. The EMCs grew even in hypoxic conditions, although the suppression of gaseous exchange strongly reduced biomass production. Cultures with different levels of hydrodynamic stress and SFI values (1.4 center dot 10(-3)-8.8 center dot 10(-3) cm min(-1)) were obtained. Proliferation rates of EMCs increased with agitation rate and the SFI. The largest number of EMCs was obtained in baffled flasks agitated at 160 rpm (K-L a of 1.47 h(-1), and SFI of 8.8 center dot 10(-3) cm min(-1)) with mild hydrodynamic stress enhancing growth. Biomass production increased with agitation and hydrodynamic stress, but only when the SFI value was below 5 center dot 10(-3) cm min(-1). The greatest biomass production was obtained in smooth 100 ml flasks agitated at 160 rpm. The differentiation of embryos was favoured by the lowest K-L a (0.11 h(-1)) and SFI (1.40 center dot 10(3) cm min(-1)) values, achieved using these flasks when agitated at 60 rpm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据