4.5 Article

Poly-γ-glutamic acid suppresses osteoclastogenesis in human osteoclast precursors and prevents joint damage in a collagen-induced murine arthritis model

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 80-86

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.09.004

关键词

Poly-gamma-glutamic acid (gamma-PGA); Osteoclast; Rheumatoid arthritis

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2013R1A1A2009617]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, Future [2016R1A2B4008606]
  3. Korea Health Technology R&D project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI17C0888, HI15C1062]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2009617, 2016R1A2B4008606] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly-gamma-glutamic acid (gamma-PGA), a natural polymer derived from Bacillus subtilis, shows anti-inflammatory activity. However, the effects of gamma-PGA on osteoclasts, which are important cells for joint destruction in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have not yet been reported. In this study, we show that gamma-PGA markedly inhibits osteoclast differentiation in normal PBMC-derived osteoclast precursors and in synovial fluid macrophages of patients with RA. gamma-PGA also reduces RANK expression by down-regulating M-CSF receptors. Additionally, oral administration of gamma-PGA attenuated bone destruction in a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) model, demonstrating decreases in inflammation, cartilage damage, and osteoclast formation in histological analyses. Taken together, these data suggest that gamma-PGA could be a good candidate for therapeutic prevention of joint destruction in RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据